Running a historical investigation: a four-stage picture that narrows one research question about the Weimar Republic, names the sources it calls for, and shows how each source is acknowledged in a footnote, a bibliography and a process log

You cannot pick a source until the question is narrow

Most investigations go wrong before any reading starts: the question is too wide to say what to open. Narrow the question and watch which sources it calls for, then how each one is acknowledged.

Investigation funnel
Broad question
Narrow the question. Watch which sources it calls for, then how each is acknowledged.
Too broad: no time, place or actors named
Investigation stageQuestion
Question Scope Sources Plan
Stage
1 / 4
Sources named
0
How the sources are acknowledged (shown in full at the plan stage)

A footnote sits at the point in your text where a claim is made, and it answers one question: where did this come from? Number the marker in the text, then give the full reference the first time: creator, title, place and publisher, year, and the page or item. Every later note to the same source can be shorter, but it follows the same pattern as every other short note. Consistency is the whole point: a reader should be able to find the exact page or poster you used. Footnotes also carry minor clarifications that would clutter the text, such as a translation of a German title. In any historical investigation, a claim without a footnote is a claim the reader cannot check.

Know This
Historians frame questions to guide inquiry, develop a coherent research plan, use evidence from a range of sources, and acknowledge every one of them appropriately.